RST signal report guide

How to give and interpret signal reports using the RST system.

The RST system

Signal reports in amateur radio use the RST system: Readability, Strength, and Tone (tone is CW only). On SSB, you give an RS report (readability and strength). On CW, you give an RST report (readability, strength, and tone).

Readability (R) — 1 to 5

How well can you understand the words or copy the code?

R Meaning In practice
1 Unreadable Cannot make out anything
2 Barely readable Catch a word here and there
3 Readable with difficulty Can copy with concentration and fills
4 Readable with little difficulty Mostly solid copy, occasional miss
5 Perfectly readable Every word/character is clear

Strength (S) — 1 to 9

How strong is the signal? Corresponds loosely to the S-meter reading.

S Meaning S-meter approx
1 Faint S1
2 Very weak S2
3 Weak S3
4 Fair S4
5 Fairly good S5
6 Good S6
7 Moderately strong S7
8 Strong S8
9 Extremely strong S9 or above

Tone (T) — 1 to 9 (CW only)

The quality of the CW tone. Modern transmitters all produce a T9 (pure) tone, so this number is almost always 9.

T Meaning
1 Extremely rough, harsh
5 Noticeably rippled
9 Pure, clean tone

How reports work in practice

The honest truth: Most operators give "59" (five-nine) on SSB and "599" (five-nine-nine) on CW regardless of actual signal quality. In contests, "59" or "599" is given to every station because the exchange must be fast. In casual contacts, honest signal reports are more useful but less common.

What "59" actually means: Readability 5 (perfectly readable), Strength 9 (extremely strong). This is the report most stations receive even when the actual signal is more like 55 or 44.

Giving honest reports: If a station is genuinely difficult to copy, say so: "You are 33 here — readable with difficulty and weak." Honest reports help the other station evaluate their antenna and power. Giving 59 to a station that is actually 33 does them no favors.

Contest reports: Always "59" or "599" regardless of actual signal quality. Contests use the exchange as a formality, not as genuine signal assessment. This is convention, not dishonesty.